Google Reader or Downloadable Reader?

Hey folks…I need some thoughts on feed readers. Currently, I have been using the feed reader connected to the Windows Live Mail email client. However, I have recently been thinking about switching to the Google Reader. The advantage of readers like Windows Live is that all of the posts are accessible offline. The Google Reader (unless I’m mistaken) can only be accessed through a web browser.

So…what feed readers do you all use and recommend? Advantages? Disadvantages?

Trackback URL

, ,

4 Comments on "Google Reader or Downloadable Reader?"

  1. Flash
    Jordan
    07/11/2009 at 5:16 pm Permalink

    I use Google Reader. I have tried several feed readers both on the computer and iPhone. I keep going back to Google Reader. Mainly because I can access it from my work/home computer and my phone without rereading feeds. Makes it easy. Especially with over 100 feeds I check daily.

  2. Flash
    Jeff Lash
    07/11/2009 at 5:33 pm Permalink

    Good point. I hadn’t thought about access across multiple computers/formats.

  3. Flash
    burnshead
    07/11/2009 at 10:47 pm Permalink

    I swear by google reader – have used it for years now. It integrates so easily with everything else google does as well. It does have a form of offline capabilities – if you install google gears in your browser you can enable it. Check out this for more info: http://www.google.com/help/reader/offline.html

    I can’t really imagine any reader working much better than gReader.

  4. Flash
    Jeff Lash
    08/11/2009 at 12:28 am Permalink

    Thanks Burns. I believe you guys have made a convert out of me.

Hi Stranger, leave a comment:

ALLOWED XHTML TAGS:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe to Comments