Posts Tagged ‘pastor’

Too Young To Be A Pastor?

Carl Trueman has been sharing some thoughts on the call to ministry and the role of the seminary in affirming it. In his first post, Trueman offers a quote from Bishop Donald Robinson questioning the wisdom of appointing young men in their mid twenties to the office of elder. Robinson says,

    Two such problems may be mentioned: how can a man’s qualifications for such a  ministry be confidently judged at a time when he still lacks those criteria which were employed in the New Testament for admission to the ministry of oversight, namely, the satisfactory discharging of the duties of being the head of a household, the successful educating of his children, his aptness to teach and discipline his household, and his blameless reputation among his neighbours? The second problem is similar: how can such a young man adequately exercise the ministry to which he is ordained, when he has no experience (of the kind mentioned in the New Testament) on which to draw?

Generally speaking, I agree with their concern. Sociologists have been documenting the growing trend of delayed adulthood for some time now. Young people are waiting longer to take on the responsibilities associated with adulthood such as getting married, settling into a career, and raising children. Additionally, we live in a transient culture where neighbors seem to change on a yearly basis (if not sooner). It is hard to develop a reputation with the people around us when so many of us are moving in and out of neighborhoods on a regular basis.

However, I think that each case must be determined on its own merits. The general trend may tend toward a lack of life experience for most twenty-somethings. Yet I know of a few friends who were married, had children, served in their church, and worked a steady job before the age of 25. Some young guys have more life experience than others at that age. We should be careful not to disqualify all young men just because they are young.

As for experience, I assume that Robinson is speaking of ministry experience. I would agree that a man being called to the pastorate should have some exposure to vocational ministry and the responsibilities of an elder. A person can gain valuable experience by way of internships, associate positions, and mentoring relationships. In my limited experience, every pastor that I served with or sat under had some kind of training or experience prior to becoming a senior pastor. We can certainly debate what type of training is sufficient or adequate but I believe that the majority of pastoral candidates have some type of pastoral ministry experience. If Robinson is speaking of life experience then we are back to the earlier discussion on age.

Of course, Robinson’s points certainly depend on a church’s view of the pastor. The Bible commonly uses the word elder to refer to the office of overseer in the church. Personally, I think there are sufficient grounds in Scripture for a plurality of elders within the church. However, many churches confuse the roles and functions of elders, deacons, and trustees in such a way that raises questions about the responsibilities of the individuals within each group. Trustees may function as elders and elders may serve as deacons. In this case, it may be hard to determine what a young man is qualified to do and what areas need further development. The problem reminds us that Scripture should guide our understanding of the offices within the church and not the latest trends in secular leadership.

So again, I agree with the general principle. Churches should be careful not to appoint a man to the highest level of leadership on the primary basis of a theological degree. At the same time, they should not disqualify a man on the basis of his youth alone. The Pastoral Epistles clearly lay out the qualifications of an elder. Scripture should be our standard for judging the suitability of a pastoral candidate. The man who fits the description found in Scripture is fit to fill that role within our churches.

The Monday Muse: Seminary or Not?

I have had several discussions with people about this subject. For young aspiring pastors coming out of college, seminary is seen as the next logical step toward overseeing a church their own. Seminary is seen by many people as the training ground for pastors. Places like the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary or Trinity Evangelical Divinity School have endeavored to train men with academic rigor while partnering with the local church to give students a taste of real life ministry. Seminaries can give you a level of education that cannot be matched in most churches. At the same time, churches like Capital Hill Baptist and Mars Hill Church have put together internship programs that are built to equip men for ministry without necessarily going to seminary. The advantage is that your theological training is done in the midst of every day ministry.

So this leads us to a question of pastoral importance:

Is seminary necessary to become a pastor?

And for further thought…

Which is a better option: seminary or church internship?

Theology for the Church

I just finished an excellent article by Gerald Heistand concerning ecclesial theology. What is ecclesial theology? “Ecclesial theology is theological reflection written to the wider believing community, for the good of the church catholic, and born out of pastoral/ecclesial concerns.” The Society for the Advancement of Ecclesial Theology was created for this very purpose. Simply put, the society desires to see robust theology being worked out in the context of the church. It is an exhortation for the revival of pastor-theologians as opposed to solely professor-theologians.

I don’t have enough fingers to count how many times I have heard people refer to theology as the work of academics and scholars. This is just not true. The work of these men is very important in changing this perception and showing how orthodoxy is essential to orthopraxy. So…I heartily commend Heistand’s article to all who want to know more about the work of the society and its call to a more ecclesial theology. As Heistand says,

The Church is God’s vehicle for changing the world. While apologetically driven academic theology is legitimate, the bulk of evangelical reflection and writing needs to be written in service to the church, to the believing community. We won’t change the world by reforming the academy. But we will–by God’s grace–change the world by renewing the church. But such renewal will only come through the communication of deep, robust, biblical, historically informed, culturally aware, thoughtful, and prophetic truth. Frankly, the sort of theology that will advance the cause of Christ will likely not find much favor in the wider academy, given its current rules of engagement. But that’s fine–our goal isn’t to win the favor of a secular academy; our goal is to renew the church.

To that I say…Amen.

The Monday Muse: Palin Predicament

Yes, I know it is Tuesday but I was sidetracked last night (in a good way) by a deep conversation with my wife concerning the church and our faith. When we finally finished, I had to hit the sack so I could get up for basketball this morning. So here we are on Tuesday looking at this week’s Monday Muse.

Last week I asked whether or not Sarah Palin’s presence on McCain’s ticket would have a positive or negative effect on his run at the presidency. No matter how you feel about Palin it is hard to deny the buzz she has created for McCain. One thought that has been thrown around lately is the legitimacy of her appeal to evangelical Christians. It seems that many evangelicals have jumped on the Palin bandwagon due to her conservative values and Christian faith. Recently, Dr. David Gushee joined the conversation by challenging the largely complementarian conservative evangelicals with the predicament of their endorsement and excitement. Gushee says, “It is an uncomfortable fact that many of the theologically conservative Christians who have endorsed Palin’s nomination would not be willing to endorse her or any other woman for service as pastor of their church.” Gushee sees an inconsistency in supporting a woman to take up a governmental leadership role and yet at the same time prohibiting her from being a pastor in a church. It might even be labeled hypocrisy from Gushee’s point of view. In closing, he believes Palin’s nomination “offers conservative Christian leaders the chance to rethink an archaic theological vision that wounds millions of devout Christian women and restricts the full exercise of their gifts.”

Being mentioned by name as “an influential advocacy group” by Dr. Gushee, CBMW (The Center for Biblical Manhood and Womanhood) posted a response on their blog to the questions raised by Gushee. In the end, CBMW sees no inconsistency with a women being able to take governmental office and yet not being allowed to pastor a church. As CBMW states,

The Bible calls women to specific roles in the church and home, but does not prohibit them from exercising leadership in secular political fields.  Therefore we must be careful to not go beyond the teaching of the Bible.  A president is not held to the same moral standards as an elder of a church.  While it is a blessing from God to have ethical or even Christian political leaders, the Bible places no such requirements on secular governments.  Even though the Bible reserves final authority in the church for men, this does not apply in the kingdom of this world.

Voddie Baucham is another evangelical who has recently spoken out about the Palin frenzy. He agrees that the excitement over Palin is perplexing for a whole different reason. As he puts it,

Complimentarians have basically argued in support of Governor Palin’s candidacy on the basis of the following:  1) there is no specific New Testament injunction against female magistrates.  2) we have old testament examples of women as magistrates.  and 3) she is not running for pastor-in-chief; therefore, we cannot hold her (or Senator McCain) to 1 Timothy 3/Titus 1 standards.   Taking their line of reasoning, what would stop evangelicals from supporting, say, a polygamist candidate?  Ridiculous?  Lets see.

So…I think there is a mixed response to Palin’s nomination and the evangelical response to it as it relates to the role and responsibility of a woman within her family and the role of women in society and church. So here’s the question:

Does Palin’s nomination create a difficult predicament for complementarians? Why or why not?

Personally, I’m not convinced by Dr. Gushee’s argument. I am thankful for his thoughtful challenge to complementarians though I don’t think it creates the difficulties he mentions. The difference between leadership in the general society and the church is the difference between spiritual leadership and governmental leadership. Being a government leader does not inherently make you qualified to be a spiritual leader. Though a woman may be qualified to lead a government, it does not mean she is called or even commissioned to lead a church. She may be a uniquely gifted person but God does not elevate the gifts above revelation. It comes down to a matter of obedience. This can be said for all of us, not just women. I digress for now…this is just to get things started.

The Monday Muse

Do you think churches should have regular evaluations of the worship gatherings? Why or why not?

Join the discussion!

Annie’s Music


You can pick up my wife's album on iTunes or Amazon. Interested in booking her for a show? Visit her contact page at www.annielash.com.

Blog Sponsors

Westminster Bookstore

You can support this site by visiting the sponsors above.

Twitter Updates

Latest Comments

Top Categories

Archives